Would you be in favor of putting one human-being to death in order to save a hundred thousand others human beings?
Well, there is a specific term for that practice - it is called human sacrifice. An old tradition.
Traditionally the individual is put to death against his will, so that he (or she) is actually murdered.
Do you approve or condone human sacrifice?
Do you approve or condone human sacrifice?
Imagine a bridge in which someone will certainly die while crossing thru it.
How about making this bridge a mandatory path for everyone?
How about making this bridge a mandatory path for everyone?
Proxy Murder
Whenever medical procedures or rules pose risks to a human-life, a mandatory enforcement of such rules or procedures will result in human sacrifice. It will result in murder.
Non risk-free practices can not be mandatory.
Whenever there is a risk - it can not be mandatory.
Pushing people to life-threatening risks they are not willing to take is equivalent to proxy killing. It is human-sacrifice.
Likewise blackmail or pressing people to take risks against their will is also proxy murder.
Pushing people to life-threatening risks they are not willing to take is equivalent to proxy killing. It is human-sacrifice.
Likewise blackmail or pressing people to take risks against their will is also proxy murder.
If you condone human-sacrifice of any kind, then you have blood on your hands.
It goes without saying - for the so called ("Judeo-Christian") religious people - you should certainly know how people performing human-sacrifices is portrayed in the Scriptures - as Murderers.
For non-religious people - Moral/Universal Law is the last resort. You are the ones initiating aggression and violence against others. Expect Force against you. It is Universal Law.
